Research method

How every Mars comparison is structured

A published framework keeps the questions stable, makes uncertainty visible and prevents editorial preference becoming an undisclosed score.

Every comparison begins with the same field list. A field is populated only when the wording and date can be recorded without turning an unverified claim into an editorial fact.

Five comparison rules

1. Mars remains the benchmark

Every pair starts with Mars. The site does not expand into generic profiles or rankings, which protects the project’s narrow comparison purpose.

2. Both sides receive the same question

Fields, labels and uncertainty language remain symmetrical. Visual colour is used to distinguish columns, not to signal a winner.

3. Unknown stays unknown

Missing or conflicting information is marked “Not independently confirmed”. It is never silently converted into zero, false or a disadvantage.

4. Every observation is dated

The web changes quickly. A visible snapshot date tells readers when the comparison was last materially reviewed and avoids presenting old observations as current guarantees.

5. UK describes the audience

British English and UK-oriented explanations are used throughout. This does not establish that either compared service offers UK delivery, UK vendors or domestic availability.

Corrections

Material corrections should identify the page, field and a public source. Do not submit credentials, private communications, personal data or operational access information. See the corrections page.